Sunday, December 27, 2009

Ever find yourself asking, "Where do they get this shit?!"

Today, after having a nice family dinner, I plopped down on the couch and noticed that tru-tv was running the new Jesse Ventura show, Conspiracy Theory. Last installment I saw was just enough to intrigue me. So I thought wow, I want to see more, I wonder if this show is any good.

Well wonder no more. Tonight has the distinct honor of being a huge piece of yellow journalism parading as reality tv. It stunk almost as bad as those Vince Foster videos distributed during the Clinton Administration. Seriously, all that was missing, was a big money shot of Hal Lindsey burning books and performing exorcisms.

I was thoroughly disappointed. Jesse Ventura was a Navy Seal, he has been a popular governor, and most of the time, his stuff seemed pretty common sense. So when he took this departure into hack-land, I was really really disappointed on all levels. It was the most dispicable form of tea-baggery I have seen in a while.

First he sets it up. He says he thinks that saving the planet is a good thing. But then in the show, he kept making statements that indicated, Jesse had already changed his mind, --that global warming science was junk science. Little slips here and there. Phrases like, "So-called science," etc., and so on. Subtle stuff for audience members who aren't necessarily used to listening or watching for these little phrases that indicate the actual position of the speaker as opposed to their proposed position on the matter.

Then he keeps going on about how Global Warming Science is a lead-in for industry, and that people like Al Gore are going to make Billions, Trillions of dollars from taxing the shit out of "Just folks" like Jesse--you and me. No mention is made about the gazillions of dollars made by oil companies over the last 100 years.

Anyone worth their salt, understands that in a global economy, the way to make things stick, is to make them marketable. Sort of like that quote from Ted Nugent. "If you want to save an animal, then eat it." Because people preserve things they eat by breeding them and growing them. Well market forces preserve things that generate capital. Its pretty simple stuff.

There was an alleged scientist on his show who refused to use his name or be shown on television because of death threats from environmentalists or from opposing camps hellbent on making money on global warming. Because if you can control Carbon--which is a ubiquitous element, then you can control every aspect of human life on this planet through regulations. Hence the new, and improved New World Order with scrubbing bubbles.

Anyhow there was nothing for me, to suggest that this man was a} really a scientist, and b} had actually received credible threats to his person or family, due to his professional stance regarding this manner. It was just some dude in silohette. It could have been Joe the Plumber for all we know. But what stuck out at me, was the little bits of dog whistle politics. Joe-the-Scientist mentioned the "New Religion" of Environmentalism. Ah yes, that new--religion--the big giant, super sekret threat to Christian Republicans everywhere! They are coming to take you away ha ha! To where everything is green--and there is no Jesus, and they will force you to have abortions in the name of Gaia, while feeding you tofu through a tube, and making you do yoga! The Environmental Movement will turn you all into a bunch of GAY BABY-EATING HEATHENS! RUN Joe RUN!



When Jesse had his crack team of investigators on the job researching these claims about the hoax of global warming and its true-economic/world domination goals--all I oculd think, was and..... um, if you are really researching a conspiracy, don't you need to research the background of the people coming to you with this tripe? What makes their credibility irrefutable as opposed to the people and industries they impugn? Just saying. What industries are THEY connected to? Because these people didn't look like the type that lived in basements or bought their clothes at biglots.

I will confess, my eyes glazed over at some point. I turned the channel. Its the same old shit I have been reading and hearing since I first set foot into a Baptist church in the 70s, to listen to preaching against Vegetarianism and transcendental meditation--these habits often went hand in hand with Lovelock's Gaia Hypothesis.

GASP!
SPUTTER!


Unlike the rest of America, that seems to suffer amnesia, I remember the times when Pat Robertson did not sell healthbars and shakes on the 700 club or through GNC. I remember a time, when people who went to healthfood stores were--ahem---frowned upon, perhaps as much as those who dabbled with ouigi boards or tarot cards.

Back when being green was almost the same as eating healthy--for a variety of reasons, and all of it was considered synonymous to the lifestyles of Nazis and considered behavior that only occured within dangerous, deviant cults. All of it was considered a cluster of symptoms that represented a new, dangerous religion for hippies and feminists.

Anyhow got on a tangent. The point is, whether we go green or keep using up finite resources, someone[s] will make money. End of story. Someone[s] is always poised to benefit from innovation, in changing times, yesterday's trash is tomorrow's commodity.

Now if that person in silohette had appeared in name, and if it had been verifiable through credible means, I would have been intrigued. Whenever one has a movement that gains power and importance, there are always the dangers of true believers, and profiteers.

But what was presented to me in that 15 minutes was tripe. It was dissapointing, it was it's own conspiracy theory. I was not impressed. And after all the billions of dollars spent by big energy interests to spread misinformation about pollution, global warming and the like--I cannot help but raise an eyebrow and wonder who is funding this show? I didn't see Dick Armey's name on there, but it sure stunk like something of his. Anyhow, the New York Times had this to say on the matter April 23 2009:

For more than a decade the Global Climate Coalition, a group representing industries with profits tied to fossil fuels, led an aggressive lobbying and public relations campaign against the idea that emissions of heat-trapping gases could lead to global warming....The coalition was financed by fees from large corporations and trade groups representing the oil, coal and auto industries, among others. In 1997, the year an international climate agreement that came to be known as the Kyoto Protocol was negotiated, its budget totaled $1.68 million, according to tax records obtained by environmental groups. Throughout the 1990s, when the coalition conducted a multimillion-dollar advertising campaign challenging the merits of an international agreement, policy makers and pundits were fiercely debating whether humans could dangerously warm the planet.


Ventura's bunch believes that the people who promote global warming, and the industries that are springing up to counter it--through reduced carbon emissions, carbon trade and the like, are trying to control the world. Instead of the Jewish Banking Conspiracy--we will now have the Carbon Footprint Conspiracy.

If Ventura had offered something other than inuendo and statements by anonymous characters, I might have been intrigued enough to watch all the way through. I have no doubt that there are powerful market forces getting into place, in the hopes of profitting on new industries, new technologies, and who knows what else. I mean just look at Big Pharma Lobbyests.

I also have no doubt that somewhere out there, the next Dick Cheney and Karl Rove are looking for ways to install themselves in positions of power and authority within whatever passes for the Military Industrial Complex, so that they can drive the market this way or that. We did just fight a war over oil in Iraq--if that ain't a conspiracy--then I don't know what is. It's also a sign. Petroleum is a finite resource in a world with a growing population, that is more and more dependent on petroleum products--whether its cars, planes, heating fuel, plastics--you name it.

The smart money is on finding alternatives before we hit the 11th hour, if we haven't already. Even if global warming weren't a threat, fossil fuel shortages will be. Potable water shortages will be.

As for the fears that fanatical environmentalists will create laws to control Americans, to reduce our carbon footprints and our population {think Forced Chinese Abortions}--heck--look at the fight we have to have to get an elective abortion in this country--then imagine doing that under the Stupak Amendment. Its sort of like some of those gun nuts out there. The big self fullfilling prophecy. Some of these people are so busy trying to "get theirs" that they cannot seem to regulate their own behavior--so they seek to regulate everybody else's.

I also find it ironic that conservatives would get pissed about Americans taking advantage of capitalism. They are making money. That is what you guys said this was all about.

Its a shame. I was expecting something of higher quality from Mr Ventura. And that comment I saw about people being Lemmings. That too was disappointing. American People, especially Blue Collar Americans bust their asses everyday at jobs that don't pay nearly enough, with few benefits, and very little actual down time. And somewhere in all that they manage to raise families and keep this country going. Lemmings is not the word I would use to describe that behavior. Its insulting because it doesn't recognize how Corporate America works hand in hand with the government to force the rest of us into dead end jobs while simultaneously disenfranchising us from the government that is supposed to serve US.

Like I said, Teabaggery of the lowest sort. I will say it again, I really expected more from Mr Ventura.

Friday, December 25, 2009

Merry Xmas

Pet Peeves Never Die

I know it's Christmas and I am supposed to wish everyone a Merry Christmas and not be annoyed for like one day.

Well keep wishing.

The last two days, there have been stories in the news involving women in the military and pregnancy. The first one was about a General, getting fed up with the number of women getting knocked up while active duty esp women on deployment. This is something that annoyed me greatly while active duty as well.

I have two words for you people, *Birth Control.

The big deal about this discussion is this. You sign a contract to be in the military. They spend a lot of money training you, anticipating your fullfillment of that contract. They pay for your travel, you get some benefits, etc., So it behooves a single woman to do what it takes to avoid getting pregnant. There is also the expectation that Married women on deployment also avoid this during those times--the married women have more complicated circumstances, esp career military women--its another discussion.

One thing I put up with in uniform was this hostility towards women in general. People didn't want you in the military, but they were always excited when new women showed up at the command. Some were not even subtle about the prospect of--dare I say it? Fresh Meat. {I know --Charming}.

Sex was alsmot always available to men or women. It didn't matter if you were pretty, or not, single or not. There was usually always someone around willing to scratch that proverbial itch. And the wise military member who indulged in such hookups made sure that they used proper protection for two reasons: To prevent the spread of STDs which includes AIDs, and to Prevent unwanted, untimely, unplanned pregnancies.

I roomed with quite a few single girls who didn't take such precautions. I would be more sympathetic if the numbers reflected the statistics regarding failure of birth control, but unfortunately that was not the case.

Some single girls wanted to get knocked up so they wouldnt have to go to sea, or be deployed. I like to think that this is a rarity, but there it is. Some were just dumb as a box of rocks. They didn't have the sense that the gods gave little green apples, and didn't use birth control, or used it haphazardly.

This is one of those times however, when getting pregnant, severely affects contractual obligations. Its one thing to push for women serving in any capacity in the military. Its another entirely, to push for that only to come up short handed because they were not careful, or did not abstain when it was necessary to do so.

It pisses me off, because women like myself who were responsible, who didn't get pregnant in uniform, who take precautions--we get a double whammy. First we get slammed as sluts for taking responsibility for our desires, and for our disease prevention and pregnancy prevention methods--for owning it. And then we get slammed by people who are mysogynists, who use every single pregnant military woman as an example of why no woman should be allowed to serve in any capacity--as if we are are potential breeders just by existing. And opportunistic breeders at that.

It's not fair.

It's not fair to the women who are responsible for their sex lives and their sexual hygiene.

It's not fair to the men and women who will have to take on your jobs because your billet is now empty unexpectedly.

If you sign up, then you should own that too.

Any man who wants to hook up with you, who won't wear a condom--you should cut that visit short. Forget about if he will call you in the morning, or respect you or what not. If he can't even put on a raincoat, then all those other issues are moot. He doesn't even care enough to protect you from any disease he might be carrying, and he is self destructive enough that he also doesn't take care of himself and protect his health.

Because if he is chasing your tail tonight, and not using protection, then one has to ask, whose tail was it the night before, and and the night before that and so on and so forth--sans raincoat? Were they clean? Will you all shake hands in the maternity ward between contractions? Or commiserate over anti-virals? Just saying....

Also, women need to use more than one method of birth control--especially under these circumstances to help alleviate known failure rates and to give dual protection from unplanned pregnancies and disease. And barring that, they need to abstain.

If you didn't want to go into combat, or go to sea or or be deployed, then I have to ask, why you signed up in the first place? Not wanting to deploy--is no reason to bring a child into this world. The military is a job, it is a way of life, it is not welfare.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

More on Proposed Oklahoma Persecution of Women Law {latest fuctard friday post}

It occured to me that the Oklahoma law may be a violation of HIPPA. I could be wrong. But there it is.

Understanding HIPAA Privacy
The Privacy Rule provides federal protections for personal health information held by covered entities and gives patients an array of rights with respect to that information. At the same time, the Privacy Rule is balanced so that it permits the disclosure of personal health information needed for patient care and other important purposes.


Your Health Information Is Protected By Federal Law
Most of us believe that our medical and other health information is private and should be protected, and we want to know who has this information. The Privacy Rule, a Federal law, gives you rights over your health information and sets rules and limits on who can look at and receive your health information.



Its not clear to me that the State would have to follow the rules, but there is this:

What Information Is Protected

•Information your doctors, nurses, and other health care providers put in your medical record
•Conversations your doctor has about your care or treatment with nurses and others
•Information about you in your health insurer’s computer system
•Billing information about you at your clinic
•Most other health information about you held by those who must follow this law


Who Can Look at and Receive Your Health Information

The law sets rules and limits on who can look at and receive your health information

To make sure that your health information is protected in a way that does not interfere with your health care, your information can be used and shared:

•For your treatment and care coordination
•To pay doctors and hospitals for your health care and to help run their businesses
•With your family, relatives, friends, or others you identify who are involved with your health care or your health care bills, unless you object
•To make sure doctors give good care and nursing homes are clean and safe
•To protect the public's health, such as by reporting when the flu is in your area
•To make required reports to the police, such as reporting gunshot wounds
Your health information cannot be used or shared without your written permission unless this law allows it. For example, without your authorization, your provider generally cannot:

•Give your information to your employer
•Use or share your information for marketing or advertising purposes
•Share private notes about your health care


Gosh well basically the questions that go far beyond the CDC standards for gathering statistical data could be considered private. Certainly getting an abortion isn't like being a carrier of a flu virus or herpes or AIDs. So there is no public health issue served by this report. Nor is it necessarily like that of a gunshot wound, the exception being when minors are impregnated by adult sex predators.

Certainly many of these questions involve treatment options. Anesthesia, if it was used, what kind, method of abortion, who the doctor is, who the insurer is, etc., are violations of HIPPA, as is sharing this information with the state if the person is employed and insured through the state either as an employee, or an appointee or an elected public servant. That right there is a conflict of interest.

basically:
If you believe your rights are being denied or your health information isn’t being protected, you can– File a complaint with your provider or health insurer– File a complaint with the U.S. Government.

Graphic Descriptions and Depictions at the Crack O' Dawn.



As I watched the news regarding American politics very early this morning, I had the following epiphany:

Observing American Politics is a lot like looking up a hooker's skirt after a long night's work. Its unattractive, it smells, and most of all, its in need of a good douching.


America needs a good douche people.

What more do you want me to say? We have had enough of bad douche's like Dick Armey and Joe Leiberman, now what America needs, is a good douche.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Its Fuctard Friday!

Okay, now I have seen everything. Seriously. I have seen it all.

Apparently Oklahoma wants to enforce a new law wherein if a woman has an abortion, she has to submit certain statistical data where it can be posted on a public website.

WOW. What the FUCK Oklahoma?! Oh Wait I forgot....


According to Senator Todd Lamb:

"We want to collect hard data that can be a useful tool in helping prevent future unwanted pregnancies."


Really? And are you going to also post public information about Men treated for Venereal Disease? Or how about Erectile Dysfunction?

The law requires doctors to fill out a 10-page questionnaire for every abortion performed, including asking the woman about her age, marital status, race and years of education.


Here are the Questions for this "Statistical Data".

1.
Date of Abortion


Wasn't that when so&so was absent from school or took a personal day from work?

2. County in which Abortionw as performed.


She said that was a shopping trip--HA!

3. Age of Mother


That would be about her age--the skank!

4. Marital Status of Mother


If she is married, then clearly she is aborting a love child--that makes her an adultress as well---if she is single it will be assumed that the child is either of unknown paternty {slut!} or bi-racial.

5. Race of Mother


This helps narrow it down a lot.

6. Years of Education of Mother


Which will it be? Single poor mother with no Highschool Diploma or intellectual elitist baby eating whore?

7. State or Foreign Country of Residence of Mother.


In case there was any doubt.

8. Total Number of Previous Pregnancies of the Mother.


They want to catch that .3 percent of women who use Abortion as birth control, and then punish the rest of us for it.

9. Live Births


If you live next door to a woman of a specific age and race, whose marital status you know, with ? many children, with an educational background that matches the questionaire--hey mystery solved!

10. Miscarriages


11. Induced Abortions


These last two--that way you can decide whether to feel sorry for her or kill the bitch on sight!

12. Approximate gestation age in weeks, as measured from last menstrual period of the mother, of the unborn child subject to abortion.


Wow this shit aint personal at all. Why dont you ask her what kind of tampon or maxi pad she uses while you are at it? And note that the word *CHILD* is used. That is supposed to make us all feel guilty for even having the thought.

13. Method of abortion used: Suction-Aspiration, Dilation-Curretage, RU486, Methotrexate, Other Drug-Chemical-Medicine--please specify; dilation and evacuation, Saline, Urea, Prostoglandins, Partial Birth Abortion, Hysteroctomy, Other--please specify.


14. Was the infant born alive as a result of the abortion?


15. If Yes, were life sustaining measures taken?

16. How long did the infant survive?

17. Was Anesthesia administered to the mother?

Good Gods--I hope so.

18. If yes what type
?
19. How was it administerred?


20 Method of fetal tissue disposal?

I get the feeling here, that it is so if you have any fanatical crazy anti-choice neighbors, they can show up at your private residence and wave pictures of fetuses in trashcans in your face. Or perhaps this is for one of those websites that is being saved for the day when abortion is criminalized and vigilantes can ride you down in the streets and put a bullet in your head for the crime of abortion.

21. The Abortion Provider shall ask the pregnant female to provide, orally or in writing, the reason[s] she is seeking an abortion.


Really? Are you goint to see her after class? Are you going to ask the "Inseminating Male[s] WHY they didn't use a fucking condom? Note that the word person, never enters into the language regarding the woman.

22: Having a baby would:

Dramatically Change the life of the Mother

[well DUH]
Would Interfere with the education of the mother

Would interfere with the job/employment/career of the mother

{all of these reasons make her a selfish bitch}

Mother has other children or dependents

This makes her a puppy mill--if only she would stop fucking--dare to dream.

Mother cannot afford child


Mother is unmarried

The slut!

You note that the woman--the person is refered to only as Mother. Mothers are never supposed to say no. They ALWAYS put their children and families before them, so by denying the status of mother--this makes you BAD. This makes the woman, selfish, evil, hateful, potentially stupid--because if Birth Control doesnt work--well it must be *HER fault for having sex in the first place.

Anyhow the reasons are interesting.

22. Then there is method of payment:
Private Insurance, Public Health Plan, Medicaid, Private Pay, Other--please specify.


This is to help anti-choicers put pressure on insurance co's and the government to stop paying for any kind of abortion under any circumstances.

23. Type of Medical Insurance Coverage, if any [check one] fee for service provider, managed care co, other--please specify.


24. Sum of fees collected.

25. Specialty area of Medicine of Physician.

That's so when roving death squads go after all those sluts, they know which doctors to shoot in the head too.

26. Was Ultrasound Equipment used before the procedure?
Vaginal?Abdominal? or Both? Before During After?


Code for: Did you stick anything else in your coochie? And did you enjoy it? This is fucking amazing. This is going to be on line for public viewing. And as a requirement for the procedure--they are not asking for volunteers for a study--they want to make this THE LAW. If Oklahoma Passes this, you can bet your last dollar that many states will follow with their attempts and probably even more invasive Q/A for their local crop of prego-slatterns.

This question is interesting:
Was the Abortion performed within the scope of employment of an Oklahoma State Employee or political subdivision of the state?


State Employees and political appointees? WOW. Talk about a Witch Hunt! I wonder how this question would affect advancement of state employees, as well as election time voter guides which Oklahoma has been famous for?



Now its interesting that there are several sections in which the statute gives implied consent to abortions performed to save the life and health of the mother. Those are probably mostly exempt from further harassment--maybe.

There is a whole special section for Minors. And we all know how big they are at participating in embarassing state run questionaires while wrestling with the adult consequences of childish behavior.

There is also a special section for physicians to report injuries due to an attempted abortion. I wonder if that counts if you knew you were pregnant? Hmmmmmm. Whose body is this again? Not mine apparently.

Now according to this statute the state health department is supposed to take precautions to ensure that subjects cannot be reasonably identified by information provided on the website.

Well I will say that in an unrelated matter--the United States Air Force some time ago, used to list similar data showing religious affiliation of its members. They removed the information because it was easy to ID people by Rank and Gender. Just Rank and Gender is all it took. Now Imagine what could be done with the info on this monster? You can read the whole bill at the link provided above.

According to the CNN story, a Democratic Legislator replied:

"Nosy neighbors with some effort could identify or, even worse, misidentify these women who answer these questions," says former state Rep. Wanda Jo Stapleton, one of two Oklahoma residents on whose behalf the Center for Reproductive Rights brought the lawsuit against the measure.


Yes, or fanatical religious nuts--they put forth more than a little effort. I mean what is stalking amongst friends?

Lamb says he believes the law will stand. "None of the bill is being challenged on the merits of the legislation," he says.


The merits of the legislation? You are asking about things being put into or taking out of a woman's vagina. You are collecting and posting enough information that one could track a subject down and harass her or shame her publicly. That she could loose her job because her boss doesn't approve of abortion, loose advancement opportunities, or even have her life threatened. And you Mr Lamb, think that this legislation has some merit in a place other than hell?

What a moron. When asked why he helped draft this legislation:

Why draft the legislation?

"I'm pro-life," he [Lamb] says. "Oklahoma is a conservative state. We are a pro-life state, and I believe it's important public policy to stand on the side of sanctity of life."


Really? I thought Oklahoma was an American State. And that it's citizens are all Americans and entitled to all the rights and privliges conveyed by that citizenship? I thought Pro-life has more to do with Church Affiliation than with citizenship.

Sanctity of whose life again? Not the Womans. Apparently there is nothing sanctified about that. Otherwise why would it be permissible to walk all over her right to privacy or bodily integrity?

Why doesn't the legislation require the Father[s] to be present for the abortion? Maybe even help perform the procedure? I mean lets turn this into a more equitable trauma-fest shall we? Why isn't their statistical data important?

Why isn't the Father[s] age, state or country, marital status, place of employment, level of education, etc., important?


Yea, I thought so you mysogynistic pigs.

If this bullshit passes, expect this to be coming to a legislator near you.

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Its Fuctard Thursday...





Okay when I saw this on MSNBC I 'bout shit myself over the shear stupidity of this story. Apparently an 8 yr old kid was removed from school for drawing a picture of a crucifix. Yep, a picture of Jesus crucified on the cross.

Of course the idiot brigade was all over this, because it is a depiction of violence. Well, you will get no argument from me there. Jesus and uncounted thousands of other people {maybe even more} were tortured to death on crosses and by other means by the Roman Empire. It is a form of torture.

But oddly enough, most Christians do not see it that way. When they look at the cross they do not see a Roman Torture Device or the demise of a political Jewish dissident who rubbed both Jewish officials and Rome the wrong way. They see the good omen of their own religion, which many associate with hope, healing, and prosperity.

So when I watched the video--I was shocked that Educators failed to put this into context. I mean, you people went to fucking college, you got a degree--I wish I could go back and get my degree without having to pawn my whole goddamn house, because it has become painfully apparent that I will do more with said degree than these people.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



I mean public schools are in trouble; and life in general, and working in those schools are hard enough without borrowing trouble--as was clearly done in this incredibly stupid case.

As the mental health professional stated, you want to look for a pattern of behavior. If this kid drew a crucifix and then maybe brought stuffed animals in, in a similar condition and then stabbed them with pencils--then sure, lets be concerned about that. But just drawing a crucifix? During the Christmas Season--hello Christ----Mass? Ring any Bells?

This is the kind of shit, that gets the World Nut Daily crowd all up on their hind legs in their cherios in the morning for Keee-rist's sake. And then everytime there is a real problem with someone being a religious asshole, this case along with other uber-Stupid cases will be thrown up in our faces as Proof that Christians are being persecuted, that there is a "War on Xmas" etc., and so on.

So I would like to ask the people of the United States---To engage their brain right now.

Its not hard. Find a comfortable place to sit. Close your eyes, and breath deeply after removing that plastic walmart bag from your head. Feel the oxygen penitrate the deepest recesses of that grey thing between your ears and marvel at the fact that you are having thoughts. That your brain is telling you to breathe, your heart to beat, and if you listen, it might even tell you, to take your hand off that hot stove and not put bengay in your own underwear on these oh so frosty mornings.

Deep heating rub is not good for the genital region--just saying. Having a brain entails some responsibilities. Like other aspects of life, it is a "Use it or Loose it" type scenario. So really you should practice everyday--letting oxygen get to your brain, and consider cultivating the ability of critical thinking. Seriously--be good to yourself, stop being a goddamn air thief and earn your keep.

Oh yea and stop being pwned by idiot bureaucrats who are incapable of writing rules that make sense.